MP3 download Archive and 9@9 Episode “Us and Them”
To reiterate the purpose of the show:
“Nine characters @ Nine P.M. (somewhere)… Explore the Left-hand-path analytically to flesh out ideas, theoretically capture its essence and attack its form. Each player seeks to both challenge and entertain you. Callers are encouraged to bring something thought-provoking to each segment.”
This exchange on Facebook was shared with me, since I do not have an account there. I found it to be amusing for a couple of reasons.
- 1. A Like-page to promote the show was put up voluntarily by Darryl Hutchins II, he seems to have either tried to transfer ownership or deleted it (I can’t be sure at this point) in retaliation to a false claim.
- 2. The false claim is that (I quote) “I deleted the page because Alison Jones misrepresented Concomitant Dissidence as a group of racist. She knowingly lied about our position. I will not put up with that. “
This allegation, I’m told, came directly from the 9@9 episode which aired on March 9th.
First, the burden of proof is on the accuser. Lies? Slander? Proofs or GTFO.
If one has, as Darryl states, “Conducted myself honorably“, I would think that would include exercising a level of self- honesty about the actual reasons for removing a Facebook like page and making false-accusations. I don’t care if you lie to me, or lie to your sycophants; everybody lies; however if one were genuinely interested in putting your ideation through trials by fire, then you might start with the testicular fortitude to light the match. Parading your straw-men on Facebook isn’t really changing much but your status update. Not to mention, am I somehow difficult to reach with my oh so large Internet foot-print? I digress…
During my 60 minutes of air time, at no time did I mention Concomitant Dissidence. My commentary was fairly general in relation to events and people I have observed in Social Media over the last two decades for more than 55 minutes of the show. In recent years, social platforms such as Facebook appear to be the favored venue for airing grievances (which appears to be the case here as demonstrated by the screen cap of Darryl’s beef). Yoo hoo, I’m not on Facebook Darryl.
Second, I would think that it’s more intellectually honest to address a reaction incited in oneself, than it is to attack the provocation for it. But hey, Hit me with your Best shot!
Readers of my blog interested in examples of NLP/External Considering/Identifying and Fourth Way philosophy (ala G.I. Gurdjieff) might find this a fascinating study. Those with eyes to see, can clearly peep what I’m looking at here.
I have taken a few key-phrases I used purposefully to create a perception from the audio clip, to provide contextual examples:
A. “We’re definitely not talking about a collective.”
DH has been recently involved in a group collaboration project called Concomitant Dissidence; the definition has been provided for blog subscribers (see: What is Concomitant Dissidence?). Feel free to have a look around and cast your own judgment about the content therein. What the hell do I know anyway, I’m just a woman…Ooo lala.
Note: A joining of two terms Concomitant + Dissidence; implies that the group of bloggers happen to share a level of dissent for a variety of topics such as culture, politics, and memetic ideologies. This appears to be the case with the participants on the blog. Key term in the Q&A: “Kollective.”
B. “It’s not racism, it’s racialism.”
Anyone familiar with my views on racism and racialism wouldn’t have made such a misstep in interpreting this quote as a form of slander. In fact, as Darryl correctly identified I was directly quoting him from a previous public statement ( paraphrased). Information populated by the Nexion, as well as through Darryl’s personal blog (of which I am subscribed). The Nexion has no control nor autonomy over that information. The Nexion appears to pride itself in populating information from a variety of sources; not always citing the author so it gives the appearance of original work. I’m hip to it. There hasn’t really been a new idea in centuries. Hey, we work with what we have access to and Memetics can either be a tool or a vice; in this case: Me thinks he doth protest too much! [Thank you Mr. Shakespeare for such an eloquent iambic pentameter, don’t mind if I do!]
Racism as a control meme has been typically defined as thus:
A belief or doctrine that inherent hierarchical differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior.
While Racialism is considered a counter-meme:
A belief in the existence and significance of racial differences, but not necessarily that any hierarchy between the races exists. Racialists typically reject claims of racial superiority.
In either case, from my point of view any/all focus on race is a race-ism. Much like playing a flute would make me a flutist, wielding race no matter the intent or end game is a form of racism. Mr. Fleming does his fair share of External Considering & Identifying when he goes on to assume that it’s a moral judgment. My point of view has nothing at all to do with morality, more so the logical fallacy and lack of critical thinking and applied scrutiny. Case in point, I am not my race, gender, nor the roles a Nomian society would have me fall in line to serve.
Races can be loosely defined as a categorization of humans by specific markers such as culture (i.e. National Location, Language, Religion, Social Interests, Politics, et. al) but most Nomian mindsets would reduce it to abstractions such as Ethnic Heritage, Skin Color, Gender or even obfuscated by ‘genes’. Race, is just another control-meme; when a person becomes hooked in (or rather plugged into) racial concerns; what follows is a roller-coaster ride of justifications vs. reasoning. “Why do we require others share our judgement?” -Emmanuel Kant Why indeed.
It can’t be wondered why Mr. Hutchins II, would react in this manner from minutia, proverbial mole-hills he has built, into a mountain of woe. Less than 10 seconds of audio, yet the Power Rating is off the charts for this simple statement (as per my Power Rating mentioned in my article on page 26 in Into the Fire, Issue#2 Honor).
I’d like to re-direct this topic back to Honor for a moment, if I may. This behavior in conjunction with the words written or spoken, are often in flux. If I am to take the statement from Ryan Fleming and put it under Ocam’s Razor (“Alison Jones clearly cannot comprehend Aeonics or heretical thinking in that case. Truth.”) there would be nothing left to consider. I’m not exactly seeing the Heretics at work here nor am I observing an Aeonic shift. In fact, I’d say this is the epitome of Nomian and Mundanity masked as something else. A guise, a mask, for what is so painfully apparent. Incidentally, a discussion is in progress of this very subject on 600 Club. Try as you may, the essence comes through the mask. I see you under there boys. Sorry, Nomos Homos. No cookie.
The 10 Principals of the National Socialist (as published in Hill of the Ravens) was blogged on Interrogistic Methodologies by Darryl Hutchins II. For what reason, I can only speculate. Even if Mr. Hutchins took these principals to heart only in-part, he doesn’t appear to be too concerned with his Honor. Concomitant Dissidence prides itself as an Information Nexion. In reviewing the information, casting judgments about it, then deciding what to do with this information is an individual choice, it would seem that the Kollective mindset is that if you don’t accept this information lock, stock and barrel; then you are enemy to the Nexion. In my decision to obviously laugh at these notions, I have made Darryl upset. Oh dear. What ever shall I do? Are we breaking up again Darry? I will, with the whole of my being, decide for myself what I think and what I shall do upon those thoughts. From my own axiomatic expressions: “To know me, is to know my expressions.” – Sin Jones
Tisk, Tisk… It seems you don’t know me at all. Hard to keep up with the Jonses, crawling out chaos and altering your perception. Oops, I did it again.
In participating in the 9@9 premise:
[x] Analytic Exploration of the Left-hand Path – Check
[x] Flesh out ideas – Check
[x] Capture its essence – Check
[x] Attack its form – Check
I have shouldered the blame for disturbing a comfort-zone. Now I ask you, wouldn’t that make me the Heretic?
Breaking up is hard to do. May even cost you a Facebook like page, and the press of 26 subscribers to a WordPress. Nothing to fret about, when you’re a devil with disposable income. Cha-ching!