What does it mean to be responsible?

From the Latin root, Responsus: An Obligation.

By the 19th century the term took on the responsibility of being held accountable juxtaposed with a set of morals.  To be held accountable is to answer for, holding an account of one’s actions and expressions.

Societal Morals are often in flux with personal morals and ethics.  Can the morals and ethics of a Serial Killer be reconciled with a civilized society?  The killer can justify his means to himself, but can he have it justified to the citizens in the locale where he resides?

The checks and balances come with a pointy reckoning of Laws, followed by a set of punishments ‘we the people’ call Just.  Justice doesn’t always coincide with basic Human Rights, and the members of ‘we’ can find themselves in inner-turmoil when faced with the conflict.

How do they attempt to reconcile it?  By penning documents, defining the terms of life and living it.  The United States carries its Constitution like a bleeding heart.   Every man, woman and child has the Right to life, although they may not have the Privilege to live it as they see fit.

If the Killer kills, a system in place will seize his person and property and hold it, against the will of the Killer.  Punishments enacted can often be cruel and unusual, but all it requires to become usual is a louder voice to muffle the sounds of agony.  Rights vs. Privilege. A Killer can have his Rights stripped from him, a formal punishment for his deeds.  He can even have his very life taken from him.  We lock the detestable away having only created a divide between the populations.  Those that have Rights, and those that have Privilege.   33 States carry the death-penalty, should we pity those that have neither?

Many argue that there are crimes against humanity that are indefensible, inexcusable and are of the utmost of crimes which seeks punishment by death.  Those that commit such acts are considered to be deserving of it.

For centuries it has been argued that punishment is within the scope of any civilized society for misdeeds but that punishment by death is within the power of the Government.  Incarceration simply isn’t enough for the most reviled of citizens.  And never mind the responsibility in shaping these proverbial monsters!

It’s even considered, in sentiment, a crime to sympathize with or mourn those that meet such a death.

The window-dressing of the criminal is tattered and stained, shall I change the curtains?

There are many crimes that carry the death-penalty that do not require the virility of a serial murderer!

If a citizen had any involvement in incidents that resulted in a death of another, this too carries such heavy penalties!  The aggravator is just as responsible as the person who committed the act!  Treason! Drug-Related offenses!  Then, the children, we cannot forget about the horrific acts committed against the smallest of citizens, the innocent!

The list grows as this civilized society determines that malicious acts cannot be reconciled!

Fear not Ye Citizens!  You can take part in this process of Responsibility!  For you are the peers of the most reviled!  You may be called to sit as Jury to Judge the evidence to determine guilt or innocence!  You, Oh Responsible One, may be called to be the executor!

Societal Morals and Ethics are set in a premise that often sits beside the thrones of gods. A straight posture that is rather proud in their self-righteous indignation, but beware of those twisted spins waiving their Religion like a Patriots Flag!  God Bless America!  It is rarely a bother that they break HIS commandments, and are just as vile!  Where is their compassion?  Where is that crimson guarantee that the great redeemer so promised in a crown of thorns?

Absolution is nigh!  It stands a golden palace on the street corner of desire!  Pass through its doors on the day of the Sun and the rays cleanse the soul of responsibility!  The gilded doors slam shut, locking away the prideful and needful things.  Satan rattles the doors, demanding that you Hold yourself Responsible!

Won’t you be held accountable?  Won’t you?

You are not really a believer, are you?  Tell me.  I really want to know.

The most human thing about you, and you sit in denial.

I understand.  No, really I do.  Humans rarely glorify the beast that is man, they seem to have a penchant for the SuperNatural…The Super Man!  That higher force that dances behind a veil of secrecy.  The critically thinking are looking up its skirt.

Man finds himself contemplating his own humanity.  His own Blood-Lust…

Would I?

Could I?

What would it take for me to…?

What made this creature?

What would it take to redeem him? Redeem me?

Why am I so truly apathetic towards his suffering?

Civilized man…Dignified and standing erect, all the while bashing in the skulls of his neighbor, coveting his possessions, and finger-painting in his blood.

The Sign is on wall.

Download mp3


Critical Thinking: What the hell is it?

Some people think they are critical thinkers but they are just deluding themselves.  There’s nothing critical about the way they think, they just follow along the popular opinion or the spoon-fed “reality” they believe they are a part of.  So what gives?

Why do they believe they are critical about social issues?  Often times, they are part of the problem.  They need a swift kick in the head, but they won’t respond well to it if it’s too brass.  They need it all sparkly and shiny, pretty and well packaged.  On occasion, you might be able to present an idea from a direction they never saw coming.  The wheel starts turning, and the hamster that’s running the damn thing has been resuscitated.

But watch out for that little zombie, it has a tendency to play dead really well.  Critical thinking doesn’t always stick, and the Free Thinkers of this world are often coming up with new ways to get people out of the herd.

I’m extremely Socratic in my methods, but who the hell wants to be bombarded with a bunch of questions all the time?  People stop listening when they become annoyed, so it’s not enough to ask the right questions that seek answers.  You can play the Devil’s Advocate without being a nuisance.

Critical Thinking has been developed over a couple of thousand years, and involves being intellectually disciplined.  It’s not enough to ask questions, you have to evaluate information from a variety of sources.  It may be personal observation and experience, or receiving information to be examined closely.  It also requires that you reflect on all of this input, and constantly develop your reasoning to discern it.   Even then, you’re far from finished.  It helps to contrast and compare your conclusions about it with others.  Outside perspective is a great way to develop checks and balances for your self.  In fact, you can transcend your own conclusions which clarify it, determine relevance, and determine its depth.

Which brings me to another matter: Objectivity.  How can we subjective beings be objective about anything?  This usually means we are being fair about the breadth of said information.  This may involve setting our own feelings, experiences and observations aside for a moment to avoid making correlations that simply aren’t there.  It’s not as easy as it sounds.  People in general, are reactive.  Then you have cause and effect playing a role in our reasoning.

Say for example a person is being accused of a crime that is sexual in nature.  Some sort of sexual assault.  If you were to serve on a jury, and had a sexual abuse in your past, can you be objective about the evidence presented in the case?  The accusation alone doesn’t prove guilt, each person is innocent until proven guilty by the prosecutor’s case.  Right?  More and more people are being convicted based on circumstantial evidence, if the litigator can paint the right circumstances to ‘win’ the case, then it is up to the critical thinking jurors to determine if there’s a reasonable amount of doubt to maintain a person’s innocence.  In a perfect world…  Sadly, jurors are often chosen because of their subjectivity for the Prosecutor’s case, the Defense team is then tasked with finding enough Objective people to give his client a fair trial. Each person hold’s another’s life in their hands when the serve in these ‘Jury by Peers’ cases.  Some people don’t care enough to be objective.  They just want their jury duty over and done with.  Some, can’t think critically and so they make their decisions based on their subjective experiences and observations in the courtroom.  How then can the evidence be examined properly to discern guilt or innocence?


This is merely one example, but I’m sure you can see the importance here of becoming a critical thinker yourself.  Even more so if you were the person that stood accused.  You’d have to come up with some pretty awesome strategy to counter the ‘Peer Group’ chosen for you but especially in the absence of critical thinkers among them.

Learning Critical Thinking takes personal dedication and discipline.  It also takes self-awareness.  If a person holds an opinion that YOU are wrong about something, rather than attempting to prove you are RIGHT, maybe you can hear them out and determine what they think you are wrong about.  That’s your start-up data.  From there, you can address each point a person presents against you.


Learning HOW to Learn, is pinnacle in your own thinking skills.  The Basic Education system has done a number on ability.  The currents of curriculum in Advanced Education aren’t much better. You may need to revel against your own programming to learn new ways to learn.

If you don’t think it’s important enough to invest in yourself, I question your value as a person.  How valuable are you?  If you can answer this without batting an eyelash, you aren’t thinking.  You are reacting.  Apply Critical Thinking and it may take you a bit longer to answer the question, but most of all you may make a self-realization in that process.


Good luck.  You’re going to need it!


Don’t believe in luck?  Then BE OF THE DEVIL!